Dam Safety Interest Group (DSIG)
Many dams around the world were designed and built over 50 years ago. As these structures age, the level of safety becomes more difficult to evaluate, particularly where original design and construction details are not known. In addition, foundation and dam degradation occurs for various reasons and many continue to worsen. Moreover, safety and design standards have changed over the years and many of these aging structures must be upgraded to meet current standards. Research
is required for the development and evaluation of new diagnostic monitoring tools and techniques in order to assess the stability and safety of existing dams. New repair materials and techniques can reduce the cost of required dam safety improvements.
The Dam Safety Interest Group (DSIG) is composed of dam owners who jointly sponsor research & development projects designed to help assess and improve the safety of dams. Today, the DSIG is represented internationally by participants from Canada, the United States, Australia, New Zealand, Sweden, France, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
Topics and Issues:
- Investigation
- Instrumentation and Monitoring
- Analysis
- Performance Assessments
- Risk Assessment and Management
Project Highlight: Comparison of Flood Hazard Estimation Methods for Dam Safety – Phase 1
Hydrology was of course one of the first civil engineering disciplines to benefit from modern statistical thinking. Sophisticated descendants of these early statistical methods are now used worldwide within the dam industry to estimate the flood hazard. Such methods, if applied correctly, provide powerful tools capable of exploring the extremes of hydrological hazard whilst at the same time honestly acknowledging the uncertainty in these estimates.
In addition to statistical methods, the Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) and Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) approaches aims to define a “maximum” design event that is a reasonable worst combination of meteorological and hydrological factors for a particular reservoir project.
As a result, a plethora of approaches now exist, each with its perceived advantages and disadvantages, and hence a wide diversity of practice exists. In some cases this reflects the differing demands of regulation and physical setting, whilst others simply reflect analyst preference.
Beyond the established approaches, the dam safety community throughout the world has a growing interest in moving towards a risk-informed management paradigm. This is not an easy transition. It is however clear that fundamental to its success, as in traditional approaches, is a transparent and reliable means of estimating extreme flood flows.
This project will provide an unbiased and structured review of the available and evolving methods, how and why they are used in across the world and, importantly, how they perform.

















